Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences

Published by : PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL PUBLICATIONS

ISSN 1681-715X

HOME   |   SEARCH   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES

-

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

-

Volume 23

July - September 2007

Number  4


 

Full Text
PDF of this Article

Assessment of anatomy curriculum for future clinicians at
College of Medicine, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia

Muhammad Mujahid Khan1

ABSTRACT

Objective: Curriculum development in medical education should be a methodical and scholarly, yet practical process that addresses the needs of future clinicians, trainees in surgery in general and Anatomy in particular. Continuous developments in undergraduate preclinical medical education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia have produced advancement in the content and delivery of basic medical sciences including human anatomy. Keeping in view the significance of curriculum development of Anatomy, the aim of this study was to find out the gravity of Anatomy teaching and students’ feedback at the end of their preclinical course about the content of anatomy and its relation with understanding the function of the body both in health and diseases.

Methodology: This study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia during the period 2004-2005. A detailed questionnaire was distributed to the medical students at the end of their anatomy course and they were asked to tick the appropriate box to give their opinion regarding course of anatomy taught to them region wise.

Results: The present study result shows that limbs and extremities (51%); histology (49%) and embryology (45%) were taught in too much detail. However, thorax (76%); abdomen (71%); headache & neck (63%); brain (57%) and pelvis and perineum (54%) were taught adequately. Furthermore, vertebral column (45%); applied anatomy (41%) and skin and connective tissue (28%) were taught less adequately.

Conclusion: It is concluded that 50% students felt that the contents of anatomy were taught adequately. However, 28(27.90%) were taught too long and 21(21.54%) students replied that they were less adequately taught. Keeping in view of the above facts, the results have a message that King Saud University should start practice, innovate the anatomy curriculum regularly to produce better future clinicians who can compete at international levels.

KEY WORDS: Anatomy, Curriculum, Medical Education.

Pak J Med Sci   July - September 2007   Vol. 23 No. 4   625-629


1. Muhammad Mujahid Khan
Dept. of Anatomy, College of Medicine,
King Khalid University Hospital,
King Saud University,
Riyadh – Saudi Arabia

Correspondence

Dr. Muhammad Mujahid Khan,
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Anatomy,
(28), College of Medicine,
King Khalid University Hospital,
King Saud University, P.O. Box 2925
Riyadh-11461, K.S.A
Email: mujahidkhankk@hotmail.com

* Received for Publication: January 22, 2007
* Accepted: April 2, 2007


HOME   |   SEARCH   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES

Professional Medical Publications
Room No. 522, 5th Floor, Panorama Centre
Building No. 2, P.O. Box 8766, Saddar, Karachi - Pakistan.
Phones : 5688791, 5689285 Fax : 5689860
pjms@pjms.com.pk